Economics

The rise of 'meta cities' and the impact on real estate investing

Hugo Machin, of the Schroders Global Cities blog, explains the rise of a new breed of 'meta cities'

10 May 2018

Hugo Machin

Hugo Machin

Co-Head of Global Real Estate Securities

Urbanisation will be the defining trend of the next 25 years. It will underpin where and how we live, how we work and what goods and services we will use.

Cities are the focal point of the global economy and certain cities are winning the race to attract companies and employees. This is because idea creation trumps manufacturing. That trend is now taking on another leg with the emergence of meta cities, led by China.

What is a meta city?

At Schroders Global Cities, we use the term meta city to describe the linking of mega cities via high speed transport and critical infrastructure. In so doing, the sum of these interlinked cities become economically more powerful than the parts.

A meta city is, essentially, numerous mega cities forming a single economic area. China is currently looking at three meta cities where the country's economic output will be focused: GBA (Pearl River), Beijing (including Tianjin and Heibei and known as ‘Jing Jin Ji’) and Yangtse River. This spend will have an outsized impact as the chart below, grouping the three meta cities together, shows:

Jing Jin Ji will be home to 130 million people, six times the New York metro area. A new proposed airport at Beijing Dashin will cater for 430 million passengers per year, covering 660 acres and costing an estimated $13 billion.

Map showing where China's meta cities are located

This huge investment in infrastructure is central to the viability of these meta cities. The ease of movement of people, goods and data is the reason behind outsized economic performance.

Despite these large numbers, it is clear that the urbanisation trend is still in its infancy in Asia.

The knowledge economy effect

Why are people being concentrated into focused geographies to such a degree that a large proportion of the world’s population will live in mega and meta cities, according to UN statistics?

The simple answer is the importance of idea creation in the knowledge economy. Peter Hall, in his ‘World Cities’ book of the 1960s, makes the point that cities first came into being as a place where capital formation took place. During and post the Industrial revolution, advisers such as lawyers, accountants and financiers were located in cities, providing services to new industries. Factories often were remote to cities with largely self-contained workforces. That has changed.

The knowledge economy is now pre-eminent. To compete and survive it has never been more important to be within the crucible of where ideas are formulated – cities. The argument that technology facilitates remote working is true but misses the crucial point of why people are ‘recentralising’. Technology has increased the ability to communicate; logically we should all be living increasingly decentralised lives. However, the opposite is true. In the knowledge economy the need to be directly connected – face to face – with people is vital. Proof of this is the rise of co-working providers like WeWork now in 74 cities and with 220,000 members, as well as the huge rise in air travel.

The trend in urbanisation from large cities, to mega cities and now meta cities is a function of this recentralisation. Cities provide economies of scale to private enterprise and government led infrastructure projects.

The Urban Age

The Industrial Revolution saw technological advancement in manufacturing and transport.

The current tech revolution is reshaping lives in multiple ways. Urban formation is the most important area. Tech is shaping cities and is, itself, being shaped by idea collision from the leading urban areas. Cities allow people to be a part of the knowledge economy, creating career opportunities across a broad spectrum of jobs.

The future iteration of urbanisation is the meta city. Governments and investors who understand the importance of connecting large cities will provide their citizens with the ability to have a stake in the knowledge economy.

Conclusion

If the knowledge economy is based on people being in close proximity to formulate, test and deploy ideas, then cities are increasingly critical to this growth.

The rise of the knowledge economy in certain cities is apparent: their success is anchored by outstanding universities and research centres and excellent transport hubs facilitating face to face meetings. This has often been at the expense of post-industrial manufacturing cities.

Meta cities are the next leg in the explosive growth in urbanisation, the turbo-charging of the need to live and work in closer proximity in order to be a part of the tech revolution.

We think that the three Chinese meta cities are just the start. Mega cities will go meta as governments rush to link large cities and expand smaller ones. The focus of this will be Asia, as populations continue to grow. This impact will create dense urban geographies whose economic output is outsized relative to the country hinterland.

  • Our global cities team launched the Global Cities blog in 2016, which acts as a resource to track the longer term trends impacting global real estate. The index uses a number of factors to identify the most economically vibrant cities across the world. More is explained here.

 

 

Important Information: This communication is marketing material. The views and opinions contained herein are those of the author(s) on this page, and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds. This material is intended to be for information purposes only and is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. It is not intended to provide and should not be relied on for accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in this document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The value of an investment can go down as well as up and is not guaranteed. All investments involve risks including the risk of possible loss of principal. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Schroders does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. Some information quoted was obtained from external sources we consider to be reliable. No responsibility can be accepted for errors of fact obtained from third parties, and this data may change with market conditions. This does not exclude any duty or liability that Schroders has to its customers under any regulatory system. Regions/ sectors shown for illustrative purposes only and should not be viewed as a recommendation to buy/sell. The opinions in this material include some forecasted views. We believe we are basing our expectations and beliefs on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of what we currently know. However, there is no guarantee than any forecasts or opinions will be realised. These views and opinions may change.  To the extent that you are in North America, this content is issued by Schroder Investment Management North America Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Schroders plc and SEC registered adviser providing asset management products and services to clients in the US and Canada. For all other users, this content is issued by Schroder Investment Management Limited, 31 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7QA. Registered No. 1893220 England. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.